Bookish, and publishing in general, seems to think that “discoverability” is a problem for readers–that readers have a hard time finding books that interest them. But I’m not sure that’s a problem that readers, the ones who currently buy books at least, actually feel. In my experience, most readers have more than enough books on their radars and to-be-read piles. (In fact, I think many readers, this one included, would be interested in an online bookstore that does more with fewer titles.)
In short, publishing has a great reason to make Bookish, but readers don’t have a great reason to use it.
In short, publishing has a great reason to make Bookish, but readers don’t have a great reason to use it.
-
joyfulchild reblogged this from bookriot
-
markruffalobuffalo likes this
-
annaverity likes this
-
inhisheart likes this
-
bibliogato likes this
-
bookoisseur reblogged this from bookriot
-
mollyglot reblogged this from themugglelibrarian
-
themugglelibrarian reblogged this from bookriot
-
gogglesque likes this
-
mightyflynn likes this
-
heavyheartedlove likes this
-
chimneyfish likes this
-
condalmo reblogged this from hobartpulp
-
chocolateraine likes this
-
themaninthearena likes this
-
alice-dorothy-virginia reblogged this from bookriot
-
harperperennial likes this
-
thescriptrix likes this
-
killers-and-liars said:
This is so true! I am not at a loss for books to read, I am at a loss of TIME to read them. I don’t want to waste that precious time on a website.
-
killers-and-liars reblogged this from bookriot
-
mybooktree reblogged this from bookriot
-
karynlibrarian reblogged this from bookriot
-
eyesthebye likes this
-
lyingmachine likes this
-
hobartpulp reblogged this from bookriot
-
bookriot posted this
